Maqola mavzusi

Mualliflar

Baxronov B.B., Navruzov R.R.

Muassasa

Abu Ali ibn Sino nomidagi Buxoro davlat tibbiyot instituti, Buxoro sh., O`zbekiston

Annotatsiya

Mazkur maqolada is gazining toksik ta’siri ostida kalamushlar qizilo‘ngach shilliq qavati morfofunktsional buzilishlarini tuzatishda biostimulyatorlardan foydalanishning zamonaviy yondashuvlari ko‘rib chiqiladi. Turli guruhlarga mansub biostimulyatorlar (o‘simlik, to‘qima va sintetik kelib chiqishli) ta’sir mexanizmlari, xususan, epiteliy regeneratsiyasi, angiogenez, antioksidant himoya va yallig‘lanish ja rayonlarini modulyatsiya qilishdagi roli tahlil qilinadi. Ayniqsa, biostimulyatorlarning qizilo‘ngach shilliq qavati morfologiyasi va funksiyasini tiklashga ta’siri, shu jumladan epitelizatsiyani tezlashtirish, hujayra proliferatsiyasini faollashtirish va yallig‘lanish mediatorlari ekspressiyasini kamaytirish kabi tajriba ma’lumotlariga alohida e’tibor qaratiladi. Keltirilgan natijalar biostimulyatorlarning toksik shikastlanishlarda kompleks davolash vositasi sifatida istiqbolliligini ko‘rsatadi va bu yo‘nalishda yangi profilaktika hamda davolash usullarini ishlab chiqishga xizmat qilishi mumkin.

Kalit so'zlar

biostimulyatorlar; is gazi; regeneratsiya; kalamushlar; angiogenez; antioksidant faol lik; yallig‘lanish.

Adabiyotlar

1. Всемирная организация здравоохране ния. Загрязнение воздуха и здоровье. — 2022. URL: https://www.who.int/ (дата обращения: 12.05.2025).
2. Попов В.И. Токсикология загрязнителей атмосферного воздуха. — М.: Медицина, 2019. — 272 с.
3. Степанов А.В., Гончаров А.А. Воздей ствие угарного газа на организм человека // Вестник экологической медицины. — 2021. — №2. — С. 45–50.
4. Kales S.N., Christiani D.C. Acute chemical emergencies. Carbon monoxide poisoning // N. Engl. J. Med. — 2002. — Vol. 347. — P. 1054 1055.
5. Центр Гидрометеорологической службы Республики Узбекистан (Узгидромет). Ежегод ный экологический бюллетень за 2023 год. — Ташкент, 2024.
6. Brown G.C., Cooper C.E. Nanomolar con centrations of nitric oxide reversibly inhibit synapto somal respiration by competing with oxygen at cyto chrome oxidase. FEBS Lett. 1994;356(2–3):295 298.
7. Weaver L.K. Carbon monoxide poisoning. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(12):1217–1225.
8. Thom S.R., Bhopale V.M., Fisher D., Zhang J. et al. Delayed neuropathology after carbon monoxide poisoning is immune-mediated. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(37):13660–13665.
9. Ryter S.W., Otterbein L.E. Carbon monox ide in biology and medicine. Bioessays. 2004;26(3):270–280.
10. Zhou D., Pan Q., Xin F. et al. Carbon monoxide-induced intestinal microbiota dysbiosis aggravates gut barrier dysfunction. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:630189.
11. Kocyigit A., Guler E.M., Dikilitas M., Ce lik H. Oxidative stress and antioxidant status in pa tients with carbon monoxide poisoning. Redox Rep. 2005;10(2):77–82.
12. Benignus V.A., Ball R.T., Faulkner K.L. Acute and chronic effects of carbon monoxide expo sure on the respiratory system in rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2000;163(1):16–23.
13. Abboud K.A., Hume S., Shehadeh H. Ef fects of carbon monoxide on gastrointestinal tract tissues in rats. J Appl Toxicol. 2011;31(4):357–364.
14. Yandim M.K., Yılmaz H., Karaca M. et al. Effects of long-term carbon monoxide exposure on gastric and esophageal mucosa. J Toxicol Envi ron Health A. 2015;78(13):809–818.
15. Derakhshan A., Sadeghian S. Chronic ex posure to low levels of carbon monoxide: morpho logic changes in gastric and esophageal epithelium. J Exp Clin Toxicol. 2020;41(3):265–275.
16. Aydin M.D. et al. CO-induced neuromus cular disruption in esophageal peristalsis. Toxicol Ind Health. 2019;35(4):265–273.
17. Zhang L. et al. Effect of carbon monoxide on esophageal motility in rats. J Gastrointest Motil. 2018;24(3):211–218.
18. Liu W. et al. LES dysfunction induced by CO inhalation. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2017;10:253–259.
19. Nam K.H. et al. Manometric changes in patients after CO exposure. Dis Esophagus. 2020;33(4):doaa002.
20. Choi Y., Kim S.J. Tight junction disrup tion in the esophagus after CO inhalation. Toxicol Lett. 2017;280:42–49.
21. Zhang J. et al. LPS penetration into esoph ageal wall under CO intoxication. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2017;69(8):579–586.
22. Kim H.S., Woo J.K. Barrier dysfunction and inflammation in CO-induced esophagitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(14):1673–1681.
23. Lee S.Y. et al. Histopathologic signs of chronic esophagitis in CO-exposed rats. J Vet Sci. 2020;21(3):e36.
24. Park J.H. et al. Expression of adhesion molecules in chronic CO toxicity. Cell Immunol. 2019;335:30–38.
25. Choi M. et al. GI symptoms and motility disorders in CO-poisoned patients. Korean J Gastro enterol. 2021;77(1):42–48.
26. Wald N.J. et al. Carbon monoxide expo sure in fire victims and GI tract impact. Thorax. 1981;36(5):366–369.
27. Ahn J.H. et al. Recovery timeline of esophageal damage after CO exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2022;437:115889.
28. Josias H.A., Nogueira F.J., et al. Aloe vera as a therapeutic agent in esophageal injury: experi mental evidence. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;265:113268.
29. Kim J.H., Yi Y.S., Kim M.Y., Cho J.Y. Role of ginseng in inflammation and repair. J Gin seng Res. 2017;41(4):435–443.
30. Kim J.H., Yi Y.S., Kim M.Y., Cho J.Y. Role of ginseng in inflammation and repair. J Gin seng Res. 2017;41(4):435–443.
31. Belyaeva I.A., Mikhailov V.V. Experi mental use of vitreous body extract in tissue repair. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2019;167(5):621–625.
32. Malkova N.I. Morphometric evaluation of esophageal healing with tissue biostimulators. Exp Pathol. 2021;18(2):121–126.
33. Zhu J., Wu C. Role of VEGF expression in esophageal mucosa repair under biostimulant ac tion. J Med Biochem. 2020;39(4):447–453.
34. Tursunov M.R. Antioxidant profile resto ration with plant-based biostimulants. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021:8876592.
35. Smirnova E.S., Rudenko A.A. Regulation of cytokine profile in esophageal inflammation by placental extracts. Cytol Histol. 2019;60(1):33–38.
36. Li F., Li H. Molecular mechanisms of tis sue regeneration with solcoseryl: activation of MAPK and PI3K pathways. Toxicol Lett. 2022;358:16–22.
37. Artemyev D.V., Ivanov A.S. Immunocyto chemical profile of esophageal mucosa after treat ment with tissue biostimulants. Exp Clin Gastroen terol. 2023;2:41–46.
38. Iskandarov M.F. Comparative efficacy of biogenic stimulants in esophageal tissue repair post CO exposure. Uzbek Med J. 2023;3(2):71–78.
39. Khalikov R.B. Evaluation of hepatotoxici ty in high-dose actovegin therapy in rats. Pharmacol Rep. 2021;73(4):892–899.
40. Yakubov T.S. Immunohistochemical markers of esophageal recovery: comparative study. Histochem Cell Biol. 2022;158(3):313–320.