COMPLICATIONS IN CURRENT CUTTING SURGERY

Bulletin of fundamental and clinic medicine, 2022 №4

Subject of the article

COMPLICATIONS IN CURRENT CUTTING SURGERY (117-121)

Authors

Kayumova D.T., Usmanova M.A.

Institution

Tashkent Medical Academy. Uzbekistan, Tashkent

Abstract

Over the last 30 years, the incidence of surgical births has increased significantly, from 7% in 1990 to more than 20% by 2020 (WHO, 2020). Although there are a number of guidelines for mother and child to perform a cesarean section, this surgery is not without its complications. Complications in cesarean section are studied in 2 groups: during surgery and postoperative complications. The postoperative period requires special attention to the woman. One of the most common complications is endometritis, which can later lead to the first stage of sepsis or an unsatisfactory condition of the uterine scar, and even lead to uterine amputation. Endometritis occurs in 1% to 3% of cases of natural childbirth, in 5-15% of cases of planned surgery, and in 15-20% of cases of emergency caesarean section (Mackeen A.D. et all., 2015). Uterine subinvolution after cesarean section, can cause postpartum uterine bleeding, endometritis, peritonitis.

Key words

Cesarean section, maternal death, thromboembolism, bleeding, infection, accidental surgical injuries, pain, neonatal death, breast milk, uterine rupture, histerectomy, abnormal placentation.

Literature

  1. Wen SW, Rusen ID, Walker M, et al; Maternal Health Study Group, Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective cesarean section among women with previous cesarean delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;191:1263-1269.
  2. Schuitemaker N, van Roosmalen J, Dekker G, et al. Maternal mortality after cesarean section in The Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;76:332-
  3. Ros HS, Lichtenstein P, Belloco R, Petersson G, Cnattingius S. Pulmonary embolism and stroke in relation to pregnancy: how can high risk women be identified? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;186:198-203.
  4. Simpson EL, Lawrenson RA, Nightingale AL, Farmer RD. Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and the puerperium: incidence and additional risk factors from a London perinatal database. BJOG. 2011;108:56.
  5. Weiss N, Bernstein, PS. Risk factor scoring for predicting venous thromboembolism in obstetric patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;182:1073.
  6. Petitti, DB. Maternal mortality and morbidity in cesarean section.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;28:763.
  7. Silver, RM, MFMU Network of NICHD. The MFMU cesarean section registry: maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;191:17.
  8. Duff P. Pathophysiology and management of postcesarean endomyometritis. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;67:269.
  9. Hopkins L, Smaill F. Antibiotic prophylaxis regimens and drugs for cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(2):CD001136.
  10. Owen J, Andrews WW. Wound complications after cesarean sections. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 37:842.
  11. Phipps MG, Watabe B, Clemons JL, et al. Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:156.
  12. Thompson JF, Roberts CL, Currie M, Ellwood DA. Prevalence and persistence of health problems after childbirth: associations with parity and method of birth. Birth. 2012;29:83-94.
  13. Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, Applebaum S, Risher P. Listening to Mothers: Report of the First National U.S. Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences. New York: Maternity Center Association, October 2012.
  14. Fisher J, Astbury J, Smith A. Adverse psychological impact of operative obstetric interventions: a prospective longitudinal study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007;31:728-738.
  15. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Martin DP, Easterling TR. Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. JAMA. 2010;283:2411
  16. Murphy DJ, Stirrat GM, Heron J, et al; ALSPAC Study Team. The relationship between caesarean section and subfertility in a population-based sample of 14,541 pregnancies.Hum Reprod. 2012;17:1914-1917.
  17. Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkens E, Gilbert WM. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med. 2009;341:1709-1714.
  18. Levine EM, Ghai V, Barton JJ, Strom CM. Mode of delivery and risk of respiratory diseases in newborns. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;97:439-442.
  19. Hakansson S, Kallen K. Caesarean section increases the risk of hospital care in childhood for asthma and gastroenteritis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013;33:757
  20. Bager P, Melbye M, Rostgaard K, Benn CS, Westergaard T. Mode of delivery and risk of allergic rhinitis and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;111:51
  21. Dessole S, Cosmi E, Balata A, et al. Accidental fetal lacerations during cesarean delivery: experience in an Italian level III university hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;191:1673-1677.
  22. DiMatteo MR, Morton SC, Lepper HS, et al. Cesarean childbirth and psychological outcomes: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2006;
  23. Rageth JC, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H. Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation. Swiss Working Group of Obstetric and Gynecologic Institutions. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;93:332-337.
  24. Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Vintzileos AM. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;177:1071-1078.
  25. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. First-birth cesarean and placentalabruption or previa at second birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011.

ARTICLES